How operational complexity compounds in revenue cycle workflows—and how to contain it.

Why Do Denials and Delays Increase as MSOs Add Locations?

Most MSO leaders expect volume to increase as they add locations. What they don’t expect is how quickly denials and payment delays accelerate alongside that growth. Even organizations with strong billing teams often see performance degrade as they scale—not because anyone is doing less work, but because complexity quietly overwhelms manual systems.

Denials and delays increase at scale because variation outpaces control.

Each New Location Introduces Operational Variability

Every practice added to an MSO brings differences that affect the revenue cycle:

  • Documentation habits
  • Provider coding patterns
  • Payer mixes
  • Authorization workflows
  • Scheduling practices

Even small variations create downstream inconsistencies that multiply across locations.

Manual Revenue Cycle Processes Don’t Normalize Differences

In a manual environment, staff are expected to:

  • Remember payer nuances
  • Catch documentation gaps
  • Adjust for local workflows
  • Monitor timelines across sites

As scale increases, this becomes unrealistic. Errors slip through not due to negligence—but due to cognitive overload.

Delayed Detection Turns Small Issues Into Large Problems

At scale, issues aren’t detected quickly enough.

Common patterns include:

  • Denial trends identified weeks later
  • Repeated documentation errors before correction
  • Appeals missed due to volume
  • Follow-ups delayed because queues are overloaded

By the time leadership sees the issue, revenue has already been lost.

Central Teams Become Bottlenecks Without Automation

Centralization concentrates expertise—but it also concentrates volume.

Without automation:

  • Central billing teams chase status instead of advancing work
  • Authorization specialists become overwhelmed
  • Follow-ups fall behind during surges

This increases both denials and payment delays.

AI Enforces Consistency Across All Locations

AI reduces denials and delays by standardizing execution:

  • Validating documentation before billing
  • Applying payer rules consistently
  • Initiating authorizations on time
  • Monitoring claims continuously
  • Escalating issues early

Variation still exists—but it no longer breaks the system.

AI Learns and Adapts as Scale Increases

As more claims flow through the system, AI identifies patterns:

  • Which providers need documentation support
  • Which payers cause frequent delays
  • Which workflows create rework

This feedback loop improves performance continuously rather than allowing issues to persist.

The Bottom Line

Denials and delays don’t increase because MSOs grow — they increase because manual controls don’t scale with growth.

AI contains complexity by enforcing consistency, detecting issues early, and absorbing volume at speed. Revenue cycle performance improves even as locations multiply.

More of our Article
CLINIC TYPE
LOCATION
INTEGRATIONS
More of our Article and Stories